Son of Patriot Act

Anita Ramasastry, a professor from the University of Washington School of Law, has a commentary on the Domestic Security Enhancement Act (aka Patriot II), Patriot II:
The Sequel Why It's Even Scarier than the First Patriot Act
. There are a lot of scary things highlighted in this article, too many to even know which to select as an excerpt. But do note two things: this document wasn't publically released, it was leaked, and apparently Congress has played little to no part in its drafting. [via Dan]

Pro-March rally

There's an Anti-War rally tomorrow but the City is still refusing to issue a permit to march to the protest's organizers. A federal appeals court has upheld a judge's ruling supporting the City's refusal to do so because of, "safety and security considerations." This seems like a dangerous precedent and violation of our First Amendment. Perhaps next time, the City will refuse to issue any permit whatsoever. After all, safety and security considerations won't be disappearing anytime soon. I think I'd like to march tomorrow with a placard that reads, "Unconvinced about war right now, pro-Constitution and pro-March." Hmmm…that doesn't roll off the tongue like I'd hoped.

You owe your Don a service

France's refusal to hop aboard the war-monger train is angering Republicans. Now some congressmen are are suggesting the United States impose trade sanctions on France. Other people are calling for a boycott of French wine. My hope? That the reduction in demand for these products will drop their prices. And that there will be less annoying American tourists in Paris next time I go there.

Speaking of France's hesitation, is France the funeral-parlor owning Bonasera and the US some sort of Godfather?

Cue FDR + 50 lbs., in white suit, Charles de Gaulle kisses his hand, etc.

Some day, and that day may never come, I'll call upon you to do a service for me.

Some think that day's arrived.

Sisters standing strong

Two Shoshone sisters in Nevada refuse to pay grazing fees for their horses and cattle on public land because they say the land was never ceded to the US government by the Shoshone.

[T]he Ruby Valley Treaty, reached by the government and the Western bands of the Shoshone Nation in 1863…granted white settlers access to Shoshone lands, but not title.

The federal Indian Claims Commission, however, decided in the 1970's that the Shoshones had lost the land through 'gradual encroachment' of the settlers. The commission awarded the Shoshones $26 million in compensation, and the Supreme Court ruled in 1985 that the tribe lost title when that money was deposited as payment, even though the Shoshones have never accepted it.

Senator Harry Reid, Democrat of Nevada, introduced legislation last year that would distribute $20,000 to each member of the tribe, thus ending the matter as far as the government is concerned.

They have been fined $3 million "for willful trespass", had 232 head of cattle taken by armed federal agents and sold auction, and now ~800 horses have been rounded up by the federal Bureau of Land Management. The sisters say they will never pay.

Not another one

First Trent Lott pines for the days of segregation, now North Carolina's Republican congressman Howard Coble is saying he believes Roosevelt made the right decision to intern Japanese-Americans during WWII. Mr. Coble is chairman of the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism and Homeland Security and made his remarks on a radio call-in program. Tons of detail about Coblegate over at IsThatLegal?. Apparently Coble doesn't feel he's said anything that warrants an apology.